🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it feels like it’s time for a rethink. Throughout its history, an celebration that began as a commemorative event of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has adopted a business-like atmosphere, growing to encompass functions where Black people are compensated to address predominantly white listeners about hidden biases and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The wave has crested, producing a diluted aftermath of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with seven days of celebration and reflection in the second week of February. Black History Month grew out of this campaign and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in October in the United Kingdom, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Netherlands.

The month has transformed since that time, placing less emphasis on the accounts of transatlantic enslavement and civil rights battles, and increasingly on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and broadly celebrating the contribution Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the manner the month is commemorated is a reflection of the political moment. How it develops is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to weakening: the restructuring of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to address systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Jarring Moment

Little demonstrates how critical it is to rethink Black History Month as much as the particular moment in which it occurs this year. In the Britain, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we witnessed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the African descendant in charge of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a position where a elected representative gains confidence to declare that the absence of Caucasian individuals in certain urban areas is a source of worry. Simultaneously, far-right parties are surging in the European continent as a entirety.

In the US, a massive attack against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the nation. A drive to scrub Black history and experience from the historical documents is under way. One of Donald Trump's early administrative commands aimed at the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the month symbolises how insufficiently it can be influential if it is limited to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the realities of the current era. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is separated from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. An academic expert, a professor at University of Greenwich, put it best when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the observance. “The problem with adopting a symbolic stance”, she wrote, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month turns into a fleeting performance rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to adjust, modify and expand actions for equal rights and acknowledgment in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a treacherous thing. There is a urge to just eliminate things like Black History Month entirely, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an period that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and tradition of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – form an infrastructure that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not just to decay as the situation evolves (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month seem? Well, first, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is distributed through the year (as various establishments are already beginning to do), parts of its content (particularly around prominent figures of color) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not shy away from political issues, and provides room for citizens, particularly youth, to express their concerns and stories. What purpose serves mere awareness of the history when it doesn’t reckon with the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the urban areas? Establishments who mark it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of hidden discrimination and awareness of subtle slights, but challenged by the dangers that affect everyone if anti-racism is not treated with importance. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and responsive. It could be that an total re-identification is in order – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.