🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to restart atomic negotiations with the United States as long as it is approached with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has stated.

The Iranian diplomat stated exclusively dialogue produced results, and shared new appeals had originated from mediators to resume discussions with the Trump administration. He claimed Iran did not have secret atomic facilities, and Iran was not yet able to allow the global atomic watchdog to visit struck enrichment centers for security reasons.

Walking a Challenging Path

The foreign minister is walking a complex route since Iran aims to avoid appear to be acting from a stance of vulnerability, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had come out more powerful defensively and emotionally from the joint assault on its atomic facilities in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material domestically that it will never give up" – the key factor of the impasse in the prior discussions.

Earlier Negotiations Unexpectedly Ended

The previous five rounds of talks between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, struck Iranian nuclear sites in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with the American leader asserting the sites had been obliterated. Subsequently, Western states exercised their authority to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran maintains they have not had a significant effect.

Ideal Resolution Proposed

Iran's diplomats said they felt they had attained a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was decided an local partnership with American involvement could refine atomic fuel. Both sides would have been able to declare success since domestic enrichment would have persisted and the US could be certain that Iran's enrichment initiative was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been decided in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could operate on Iranian soil, but that was a reasonable assumption of the consortium proposal. Officials claimed three times they had achieved a deal with the US representative the US official only for the arrangement to collapse due to "detractors in America".

Current Situation

Iranian officials stated the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the offer could be resurrected in some form if discussions restart.

The American leader recently stated he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to restart talks, but in private Tehran representatives say they are not yet obtaining clear proposals from the United States either explicitly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been charged of passivity in the aftermath of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran states diplomacy is not part of a show.

Diplomatic Standpoint

In his remarks to the conference, designed to depict the US as a controlling nation that abuses the notion of international law, the foreign minister stated the two-week conflict showed the dispute could not be resolved by combat operations. He asserted the strikes commenced with a Washington's ultimatum for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an unconditional call for a truce.

Iran is convinced the first strikes by Israel were mounted with total Washington understanding and collaboration, making faith challenging to rebuild.

Dialogue Stays the Ultimate Resolution

Araghchi declared: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted dialogue; it was the United States and the western countries that had always attempted to dictate their demands during the discussions. Negotiations can still be viable and stays the primary resolution to settle conflicts, but its criteria, rules and principles must be followed."

"If they speak to the citizens of Tehran with the language of dignity and respect, they will receive a response in the equivalent language."

Restoration and Recovery

In what is characterized by Iranian officials as the conflict of recovery and reconstruction, the foreign minister said he was confident Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been rebuilt. We learned multiple understandings from this war; we have identified our own weaknesses and the shortcomings of the opponent."

He added: "We managed to survive this war. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to eliminate, stays intact. The installations and gear, if destroyed, will be restored; what is important is the determination of the Iranian people and then the social solidarity that they sought to undermine, but did not succeed to shatter. The nation of Iran have developed stronger, more united, and more endorsing of the administration and the country in the wake of this invasion."